The document is not
the evidence.
Whether you produced it or received it.
AI-generated output is being treated as analysis. Documents are built to produce outcomes, not to report evidence. The failure mode is identical whether the document left your desk or arrived on it. The forensic standard is the same. The direction of the problem is different.
Not a Model
For boards, legal teams, investment committees, and fiduciaries about to rely on AI-generated analysis in decisions that cannot afford to be wrong. The forensic note and executive deck. Instant access. SHA-256 verified.
Were Sent
Forensic review of the document in your hand. What it claims. What is verifiable. What it was built to make you do. Written brief. SHA-256 verified at delivery.
Every document that enters
or leaves this desk is hashed.
The SHA-256 standard governs every document that passes through this desk — in both directions. This is not a security protocol. It is a forensic discipline: a cryptographic record that fixes the state of a document at a defined moment in time, independently of any party’s account of what it said.
When a document arrives for review, it is hashed at intake. The document as received is fixed. It cannot be altered — not by the client, not by the desk — without the change being detectable. The intake hash is the record of what was submitted.
When the forensic brief is delivered, it is hashed at the point of delivery. The findings are fixed. The hash is registered and returned to the client. Both ends of the engagement have a cryptographic anchor. The integrity of the entire process is independently verifiable.
For output verified before it leaves — the note, the deck, the brief — the hash is registered at publication. For documents received and reviewed, the chain runs from intake to delivery. Neither end of the record can be quietly adjusted after the fact.
Received
Hash
Review
Produced
Hash
paulfaulkner.com/256sha-hash/
