There is a category of person who will tell you leverage is irresponsible without being able to write down the liquidation formula. They are not managing risk. They are performing an opinion about it.
The same person is typically long spot in a bull market, holding a volatile asset that has historically corrected 80% or more, with no defined exit, no stated downside threshold, and no model for when their thesis is wrong. They are swimming naked and praying the tide stays in. This is not risk management. It is risk that has not been named.
This page covers the arithmetic. Not the opinion. Not the recommendation. The mathematics of what leverage actually does — and what the people lecturing about it cannot show you on paper.
A worked example. $90,000 entry. 3× leverage. Every number derived, not asserted.
The leverage table. Every common multiplier. Liquidation distance. Recovery requirement.
An interactive calculator. Your parameters. Your liquidation price. Your actual risk.
What this page is not. Financial advice. A recommendation to trade. An endorsement of leverage. The FCA disclaimer is at the bottom. Read it.
Most people who trade with leverage cannot write these down. If you can, you already know more than the majority of participants in the market.
You have already calculated the corridor. The stop loss and take profit are just orders placed at the numbers you already have. Most people skip this step. That is not a trading decision — it is the absence of one.
The spot buyer at $90,000 has unlimited downside to zero with no defined exit. In four prior cycles, Bitcoin has corrected 77%, 83%, 73%, and 65% from its peak. A repeat of the median correction from $90,000 would take the price to $20,000.
There is no liquidation at 33%. There is no mechanism that enforces capital discipline. The spot holder simply holds — all the way through a drawdown that a leveraged trader would have exited at their liquidation threshold. They call this being safe. It is being undisciplined.
The claim that spot holding avoids leverage risk is precisely backwards. The spot holder carries the volatility of the underlying — the same volatility — and adds infinite duration to the position. They are not less exposed. They are exposed without a time limit on how long they can be wrong.
The leveraged trader at 3× on $90,000 BTC has deployed $30,000 in margin. Their maximum loss is $30,000. The liquidation price is calculable before the position is opened. There is no scenario in which the losses are undefined.
This does not make leverage appropriate for all participants. It makes leverage a tool with quantifiable parameters — which is precisely what a risk framework requires. What you can measure, you can manage. What you refuse to measure, you cannot.
The leveraged trader who loses their margin loses $30,000. The spot holder who held through the 2022 bear market from peak saw an 80% drawdown with no floor, no defined exit, and no model for when they were wrong. The arithmetic is not on the side of the lecturer.
The following is a simplified illustration using round numbers. It excludes exchange funding rates, trading fees, and maintenance margin requirements — which in practice narrow the buffers shown below. Those variables are real and material. The purpose of this example is to establish the mechanical framework before those variables are layered in.
The core arithmetic does not change. Only the precision of the numbers does.
Based on $90,000 entry price. Simplified: excludes maintenance margin, funding rates, and fees. Real liquidation thresholds will be tighter. Use these as floors, not ceilings.
| Leverage | Margin ($90k notional) | Long liq price | Short liq price | Move to liq | 33.3% move return | 10% move return |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1× | $90,000 | $0 | ∞ | 100% | +33.3% | +10% |
| 2× | $45,000 | $45,000 | $135,000 | 50.0% | +66.7% | +20% |
| 3× | $30,000 | $60,000 | $120,000 | 33.3% | +100% | +30% |
| 5× | $18,000 | $72,000 | $108,000 | 20.0% | +166.5% | +50% |
| 10× | $9,000 | $81,000 | $99,000 | 10.0% | +333% | +100% |
| 20× | $4,500 | $85,500 | $94,500 | 5.0% | +666% | +200% |
| 50× | $1,800 | $88,200 | $91,800 | 2.0% | — | — |
| 100× | $900 | $89,100 | $90,900 | 1.0% | — | — |
The table above stops at 100×. The exchanges do not.
This page is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not constitute financial advice, a personal recommendation, or an inducement to enter into any transaction. Nothing on this page should be relied upon as the basis for any trading or investment decision.
Paul Faulkner and The Rogue Protocol do not hold Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) authorisation and do not provide regulated investment advice, portfolio management services, or any regulated financial service. The worked examples and interactive tools on this page are illustrative mathematical tools only. They do not represent live market data, exchange-specific conditions, or personalised advice of any kind.
Leveraged trading carries a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. You may lose some or all of your initial capital. In certain market conditions and with certain products, losses can exceed your initial deposit. Retail traders in the UK accessing leveraged crypto derivatives should be aware that FCA regulations restrict the marketing and distribution of certain leveraged crypto products to retail consumers. You should satisfy yourself as to whether any leveraged product is appropriate for your circumstances before trading.
The mathematics on this page use simplified, illustrative formulae. Real-world liquidation prices are determined by exchange-specific maintenance margin requirements, mark price calculations, funding rates, and trading fees — all of which will reduce the margins shown in the worked example. The figures above represent mechanical relationships, not executable trading conditions.